Thursday, June 4, 2009

Credit due

Work held us up so we’re a little late to the party but the transcript of the President’s Address at Cairo University can be found here. It’s long but we encourage everyone to read it in its entirety.

Current mood: Pleasantly surprised. Encouraged, perhaps?

Yes, there is the obligatory make-nice but this speech was, after all, an attempt at beginning a dialog between this country (and the West) and Islam and the degree of pandering was not much more than we heard from President Bush with respect to Islam. But there was also some uncompromising language and mild scoldings.

On the War on Terror:

The situation in Afghanistan demonstrates America’s goals, and our need to work together. Over seven years ago, the United States pursued al Qaeda and the Taliban with broad international support. We did not go by choice, we went because of necessity. I am aware that some question or justify the events of 9/11. But let us be clear: al Qaeda killed nearly 3,000 people on that day. The victims were innocent men, women and children from America and many other nations who had done nothing to harm anybody. And yet Al Qaeda chose to ruthlessly murder these people, claimed credit for the attack, and even now states their determination to kill on a massive scale. They have affiliates in many countries and are trying to expand their reach. These are not opinions to be debated; these are facts to be dealt with.

Make no mistake: we do not want to keep our troops in Afghanistan. We seek no military bases there. It is agonizing for America to lose our young men and women. It is costly and politically difficult to continue this conflict. We would gladly bring every single one of our troops home if we could be confident that there were not violent extremists in Afghanistan and Pakistan determined to kill as many Americans as they possibly can. But that is not yet the case.


On Iraq:
Let me also address the issue of Iraq. Unlike Afghanistan, Iraq was a war of choice that provoked strong differences in my country and around the world. Although I believe that the Iraqi people are ultimately better off without the tyranny of Saddam Hussein, I also believe that events in Iraq have reminded America of the need to use diplomacy and build international consensus to resolve our problems whenever possible. Indeed, we can recall the words of Thomas Jefferson, who said: “I hope that our wisdom will grow with our power, and teach us that the less we use our power the greater it will be.”

Much of the tone of the speech hinged on the inclusion/omission of any “…though I opposed…” phraseology. We’re pleased the President chose wisely while speaking of this overseas.


On Israel and the Jews:
Around the world, the Jewish people were persecuted for centuries, and anti-Semitism in Europe culminated in an unprecedented Holocaust. Tomorrow, I will visit Buchenwald, which was part of a network of camps where Jews were enslaved, tortured, shot and gassed to death by the Third Reich. Six million Jews were killed – more than the entire Jewish population of Israel today. Denying that fact is baseless, ignorant, and hateful. Threatening Israel with destruction – or repeating vile stereotypes about Jews – is deeply wrong, and only serves to evoke in the minds of Israelis this most painful of memories while preventing the peace that the people of this region deserve.


We couldn’t resist posting this paragraph, though, for it’s high irony content:

Freedom of religion is central to the ability of peoples to live together. We must always examine the ways in which we protect it. For instance, in the United States, rules on charitable giving have made it harder for Muslims to fulfill their religious obligation. That is why I am committed to working with American Muslims to ensure that they can fulfill zakat.

(italics, ours)

Whaaaa…? Isn’t this the same guy who wants to tighten-up on the exemptions for charitable contributions?


Anyway... Ralph Peters was on Fox News last night and he said that he wanted the President to speak as America’s President, not the World’s President. We believe, he succeeded.



P.S. We couldn’t help but note that the title of linked article that provided the text of the President’s speech is: “What Barack Hussein Obama told Muslims in Egypt”.

First time we’ve seen that in print, or at least in the title of an article from a Big Media outlet. We’re pleased Big Media has, behind the strength of a single speech, seen fit to sweep away restrictions concerning previous taboos. The “H”-word that dare not speak its own name is officially back on the table.

5 comments:

B-Daddy said...

Gonna have to change the masthead of the now defunct TILOBO.

Dean said...

B-Daddy,
Not so fast. Stay tuned.

SarahB said...

I was surprised at how little press the speech actually got...maybe because it was such a nod to the status quo.

Anonymous said...

It was OK as an attempt to start a re-branding of American in the Islamic world's psyche. You can tell he had his 2008 A-game speechwriters heavily involved in crafting it. "Kumbaya Islam" would have been a better speech title.

It was also obvious in reading it he had to walk a very fine tightrope, esp with re to Iran's nuclear intentions. He knows that is not going away without a very large carrot and stick presence.

I was heartened with the references to helping build more infrastructure in Afghanistan, AND, maybe more importantly helping with education in Pakistan and the central asia region. Huge swaths of the Pak child population have a choice between poverty or a psycho version of Islam taught in a Madrassa. That's it -- and even then it's not a choice: If they are lucky, they get chosen for the Madrassa because at least while they are being brainwashed they get to eat.

These are the children that end up in their teen years on the Taliban front lines, and their numbers are growing exponentially.

A firewall in the form of a true education in Pakistan has to be put up against that right now. That's nothing Obama doesn't already know -- Hopefully he's coming up with the right kind of plan to implement.

I don't know what you do about the Palestine/Israel question. But would it be a crazy notion to take "the candy that everybody wants" -- Jerusalem -- out of the equation? i.e. Put it in the hands of UN peacekeeping forces, tell both nations nobody can have it until you get this thing settled, and see how the two react? Just throwing it out there as an idea.

- Mongo's Suprised There Was No Mention In the Speech of the Prez's Early Years of "Pal'ing around with terrorists" to Further Ingratiate Himself to the Islamic World. Terrorist Fist Jab? GIMMEE SOME!

Road Dawg said...

Mr. Lloyd is correct on a couple of levels. (Holy crap, just scarred myself)

We elected our president and there should be little surprise in the tone he takes regarding his approach to the Islamic world.

I was also heartened by the commitment to infrastructure in Afghanistan. I think a "hearts and minds" approach is imperative, and we could take a political page from Hesbolla in that respect. Huge humanitarian aid with education. (Of course we call theirs indoctrination and visa versa)

With the carrot and stick philosophy re: Iran’s nuclear proliferation, I may disagree, but what are our options? We elected him, so our prayers and support need to support a successful end to our president's attempts for peace.

Do I think it will work? I look at the carrot and stick approach to N. Korea where it got us.

Tyrants will ALWAYS view conciliatory efforts, sometimes at the expense of justice or other principles as a means to their own end.

So is it "carrot and stick", or appeasement? Is our president walking the diplomatic tightrope with those who view us as infidels willing to back up the "stick" of his policy?

Time will tell, but in the meantime, while I disagree with the approach, I hope and pray for successful, meaningful and lasting peace.