And lest you may think I’m blind to other families who don’t have insurance, consider this: Haven’t we, as a country managed to find ways to provide healthcare for those who couldn’t pay for it? Even for people in other countries? We have ALWAYS done that. Our compassion for those less fortunate arises from our freedom of choice. We already have invented and implemented (both in the private and government sectors) good social programs that help millions of people. And the farther they are from government intervention, the better they run.
Government intervention IS the problem. But once we centralize healthcare through a government-administered master plan, one that will complicate and de-sensitize our compassion and sense of charity, our freedom of choice is gone. Our compassion and morality becomes legislated and soon we just won’t care about anybody else other than ourselves. Our liberty, charity, and sense of community are lost in a bureaucratic nightmare. Charities and other entities currently connecting needy people to health care will disappear or be sucked into the government plan, rendering them ineffective.
Charity. It’s an entirely relevant point and one which deserves addressing because we tend to look at the healthcare debate in terms of economics (how are we going to pay for this thing?) or from the vantage of loss of liberty and freedom (keep your politics off my body!) but what current healthcare reform also represents is a fundamental cultural shift in how we view our individual and collective responsibility to the less-fortunate.
As a percentage of GNP, we are the most privately charitable nation on the planet and it isn’t even close. The next closest are our Anglo-democratic cousins, if your keeping cultural-score at home.
This hasn’t happened by accident. Along with the individualism that we cherish as Americans comes also a private sense of community that is entirely voluntary in nature and is informed because we have the freedom to choose. A community that is enforced by our own personal convictions and not by structural or legislative fiat that it is our duty as citizens of this country to look after the less-fortunate.
We have personal knowledge of people that read, contribute and comment on this blog that have expended considerable time, talent and treasure to causes even if borne of situations which they did not concur because of a personal and entirely voluntary sense of obligation to do the right thing.
That’s the part of American exceptionalism that becomes threatened by the current version of healthcare reform. That sense of urgency, that sense of laying responsibility upon yourself to donate money, to volunteer time, to get on the phone or email to inform others of a dire situation that needs tending to gets blunted… gets diluted or muted in a culture where “everyone’s covered” and “everything’s going to be OK” when in reality it’s a damn lie.
Overreaction? Perhaps. It’s not like we are going to let people fall through the cracks when government-managed healthcare proves to be a complete failure, right? Well, maybe… because when charity starts becoming more of a black market enterprise or our collective will towards charitable action becomes disincentivized, all bets are off.
4 comments:
"In God We Trust" is printed on all the currency.
"Render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s, and unto God the things that are God’s”
Since Caesar is taking my money and proclaiming trust in God, where is my incentive to donate?
Just because the govenment proclaims trust in God, don't make it so. Just because Obama studied constitutional law, don't make that so either.
Writers fromt the American Quaker war tax resistance developed during the 17th through 19th centuries dealing with issue as they were restrained by a conscientious motive, from paying towards the expense of killing men, women and children, or laying towns and countries waste.
I know I risk the wrath of my fundamentalist brethren when I say this, but I would rather not have "In God We Trust" on my relinquished taxes when we know they are such poor stewards.
'Dawg, your reasoning sounds somewhat similar to my No prayer in public school argument.
I'm not worried about the church influencing the affairs of the state but precisely the opposite.
I wish I could quote you Dean, but you had a great line about City Hall and the house of scoundrels being decorated by the nativity scene at Christmas.
We are a generous nation. Americans gave so much money immediately after 9/11 it overwhelmed the people in charge. Charity is apparent everywhere in the private sector. Lets fix the programs already in place instead of letting the government create some plan bound to fail.
Post a Comment