... regarding this whole sorry-ass Syria mess.
We want to start off by saying we are not reflexively opposed to military intervention in Syria. Assad is a bad dude and anything we can do to reduce the planet's population of bad dudes, we are generally in favor of.
The trick however with Syria is the people who want to topple Assad contain among them also bad dudes... very, very bad dudes of the Islamist variety. Perhaps you have heard of them. While there are certainly secular liberals in the rebel ranks, their saner, rational approach to things gets rather overwhelmed in, literally, the heat of battle. Blood-thirsty jihadists tend to have that effect on people.
We appear, then, not to have learned anything from our involvement in either Libya and Egypt that are in varying degrees of chaos at the moment precisely because the "good guys" of the rebel movement didn't have the juice to influence things to more peaceful and democratic ends.
Hence:
That whole enemy of my enemies thing doesn't really apply here. #Syria #Islamists
— Dean R. Riehm (@deanriehm) September 1, 2013
Now, as recently as this past Friday evening, the President was prepared to go it alone and by alone we mean with France. Word around the campfire has it that the President had a change of heart after British Parliament's stinging rebuke to PM David Cameron's support of the war on Thursday ending any hope of help in this endeavor from our closest ally.
Obama informed congressional leaders late Friday/early Saturday that he would seek Congressional approval before doing anything in Syria. And unlike delays he applies to laws that he himself wanted to see passed, he and the Veep promptly hit the links.
Implementation of tee time: not delayed. #Syria
— Dean R. Riehm (@deanriehm) August 31, 2013
David Cameron was tres bummed and tweeted that he understood Obama's position on Syria. We were left wondering, however:
@HeyTammyBruce @David_Cameron From a practical stand point, what precisely IS Barack Obama's position on #Syria?
— Dean R. Riehm (@deanriehm) August 31, 2013
What the President has wanted to do from a brass tacks details standpoint has to this very moment not been revealed.
Of course, some people were wondering why Congress was waiting for the President to call them back to session to grant him authorization for doing something military-like in Syria.
You know, Congress can vote on stuff without asking the President's permission to take a vote.
— Dan McLaughlin (@baseballcrank) August 31, 2013
Why do people keep saying that the president has to "bring back Congress"? He's not a King. It can convene itself.
— Charles C. W. Cooke (@charlescwcooke) August 31, 2013
Secretary of State, John Kerry went on the Sunday talkies to try to convince a skeptical electorate of the righteousness of the cause and kind of made a mess of things:
NBC hack Chuck Todd on John Kerry: “Stirring Churchill-like remarks.” Yeah, Ward, not Winston.
— Razor (@hale_razor) September 1, 2013
Obama's SecState might have more credibility on war crimes if he hadn't lied to Congress about US military in Vietnam http://t.co/FHXbqiPfnU
— Tampa (@S1CT) September 1, 2013
So, some 40+ yrs. later a Winter Soldier makes the case for intervening in a foreign civil war on other side of planet. #NoBloodForEgo
— Dean R. Riehm (@deanriehm) September 3, 2013
No one, however, seemed to be very impressed with the President's sudden change of heart to go to Congress:
This was not "constitution" thing, this was a cynical maneuver to pawn off his stupid threat on someone else. #Syria #congress #Obama
— Dean R. Riehm (@deanriehm) September 2, 2013
For those of you wondering what is meant by writing checks your ass can't cover, you just saw it this past week. #Syria #Obama
— Dean R. Riehm (@deanriehm) September 2, 2013
No blood for ego. #Syria #Obama
— Dean R. Riehm (@deanriehm) September 2, 2013
I have this irresistible urge to pat Preezy on the head when he goes to Congress. He's so adorbs when he does that. #NoBloodForEgo
— Dean R. Riehm (@deanriehm) September 3, 2013
At least, the President had some bi-partisan support. Unfortunately, for him, it was this bi-partisan support:
Obama + McCain + Graham = leading indicators that the idea sucks. #NoBloodForEgo #Syria
— Dean R. Riehm (@deanriehm) September 3, 2013
Yesterday, Kerry and Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel went to the Hill for a hearing in order to gin up support for the war effort and failed miserably.
This hearing is demonstrating precisely why the executive branch is required to go to Congress before using the military.
— Charles C. W. Cooke (@charlescwcooke) September 3, 2013
Nothing more reassuring than the Secretary of State saying he's "thinking out loud" about "boots on the ground."
— Mark Hemingway (@Heminator) September 3, 2013
"Thinking out loud" Oh for crying out loud! This wasn't supposed to be a brain-storming session.
— Dean R. Riehm (@deanriehm) September 3, 2013
Hey, guys, I wasn't able to see it live but did they have a white board with a bunch of yellow stickies? #Syria #ThinkingOutLoud
— Dean R. Riehm (@deanriehm) September 3, 2013
Hagel mentions "war" when Kerry said this isn't "war." Which is it?
— Domenico Montanaro (@DomenicoNBC) September 3, 2013
Hilarious. RT @politicoroger: Sen Bob Menendez: Obama seeks "not a declaration of war, but a declaration of our values to the world." #Syria
— Charles C. W. Cooke (@charlescwcooke) September 3, 2013
Complete incoherency.
I DEFY you to tell me you've got more clarity on the Admin's Syria plan than you had before this ridiculous spectacle.
— Rick Wilson (@TheRickWilson) September 3, 2013
Such was the randomness and non-sensicalness of the reasons Hagel and Kerry were throwing out there as justifications for going to war in Syria it started resembling Cards Against The World:
Has either Kerry or Hagel played their "anal beads" card, yet? #Syria #CardsAgainstTheWorld
— Dean R. Riehm (@deanriehm) September 3, 2013
"@EdMorrissey: John Kerry's "We are not going to war in the classic sense" I think that's an actual "Cards Against the World" card. #Syria
— Dean R. Riehm (@deanriehm) September 3, 2013
Ahd while we heard one thing, others in our trusted MSM we heard another:
It's apparent from the straight news articles I've read, they were not at the same hearing I listened to yesterday. #Syria #NoBloodForEgo
— Dean R. Riehm (@deanriehm) September 4, 2013
This morning the meme for those itching for war was that it was the patriotic thing to do. No lie:
Patriotism: not serving in armed forces nor dedicating time to charity rather... bailing out our President who says stupid s**t. #Syria
— Dean R. Riehm (@deanriehm) September 4, 2013
Team O bollixed this thing from the start and now it's my patriotic duty to save his hide by supportig un-defined military action. Got it.
— Dean R. Riehm (@deanriehm) September 4, 2013
And over in Europe earlier today, the President had the cajones to try to distance himself from the "red line" comment he had made last August:
Obama: I want to take this nation to war over a statement I don't want to own. #Syria #NoBloodForEgo
— Dean R. Riehm (@deanriehm) September 4, 2013
Whether "red line" was his policy or U.N consensus doesn't matter. Unlike PM of Canada, ultimatums from the POTUS carry weight. #Syria
— Dean R. Riehm (@deanriehm) September 4, 2013
Yeah, blame everybody else but yourself:
I feel like the President blew off #Syria all semester and now he's asking Congress to take his finals for him.
— Susan (@shoshido) September 4, 2013
And look how far progressive ideology has come in just a few years. Forward!
Back in '08, who'd a thought drone assassinations, indefinite detention and starting wars in ME would be solid Dem Party platform planks?
— Dean R. Riehm (@deanriehm) September 4, 2013
At the end of the day, gang, remember this:
Back in '08, who'd a thought drone assassinations, indefinite detention and starting wars in ME would be solid Dem Party platform planks?
— Dean R. Riehm (@deanriehm) September 4, 2013
We're out of here!
No comments:
Post a Comment