Wednesday, August 17, 2011

Project Gunrunner/Operation Fast and Furious update




Now, they're just showing off rubbing people's faces in it.

You'd never believe the following if it didn't actually happen. And it sure as hell wouldn't have happened anywhere else but within the federal government.



The ATF has promoted three key supervisors of a controversial sting operation that allowed firearms to be illegally trafficked across the U.S. border into Mexico.

All three have been heavily criticized for pushing the program forward even as it became apparent that it was out of control. At least 2,000 guns were lost and many turned up at crime scenes in Mexico and two at the killing of a U.S. Border Patrol agent in Arizona.

The three supervisors have been given new management positions at the agency's headquarters in Washington. They are William G. McMahon, who was the ATF's deputy director of operations in the West, where the illegal trafficking program was focused, and William D. Newell and David Voth, both field supervisors who oversaw the program out of the agency's Phoenix office.

McMahon and Newell have acknowledged making serious mistakes in the program, which was dubbed Operation Fast and Furious.

"I share responsibility for mistakes that were made," McMahon testified to a House committee three weeks ago. "The advantage of hindsight, the benefit of a thorough review of the case, clearly points me to things that I would have done differently."

Three Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives spokesmen did not return phone calls Monday asking about the promotions. But several agents said they found the timing of the promotions surprising, given the turmoil at the agency over the failed program.

Do we speak the truth?

Oh, we believe it's worth mentioning: these, at best, "incompetents", and at worst, "running a gun-smuggling operation to advance an anti-gun narrative", let 2,000 guns go back across the border which were used to kill one Border Patrol agent and hundreds if not thousands of Mexican officials and citizens and what did all that accomplish? Zero... Zero cartel leader arrests.


Voth supervised the crew of ATF agents under the operation. As they questioned the wisdom of allowing illegal purchases, he countered that because the weapons were turning up at Mexico crime scenes, cartel leaders had to be involved. He told his crew members they were "watching the right people."

His agents did not buy it.

"Whenever we would get a trace report back," said Agent John Dodson, Voth "was jovial, if not giddy, just delighted about that: Hey, 20 of our guns were recovered with 350 pounds of dope in Mexico last night. … To them it proved the nexus to the drug cartels. It validated that were really working a cartel case here."


Mexican drug cartels were using guns? Who'd have ever thunk it?

20 of our guns, 350 pounds of dope, one dead U.S. Border Patrol agent and countless dead Mexicans.


People should swing for this and we aren't being terribly figurative.

Your mid-week, martini-worthy photo image

.
.
.
.
.
.
.





Doris, babe, don't look at us. We don't know, either.







So, just relax and we'll pour you some Montefiori Cocktail performing "Lazy Busy"


Here's something we haven't talked about in a while


It's a double-whammy of ObamaCare/Nick Gillespie fun today, gang.


First up, Nick, sporting the leather, with Grace-Marie Turner of the Galen Institute at FreedomFest in Vegas.




This is going to kill innovation. Instead of trying to figure out how to provide care faster, better, cheaper... but now everybody is looking over their shoulder trying to figure out how to comply with this new federal regulation, this new federal rule. We already have thousands of pages of regulations that have come down as a result of the passage of this law almost a year and half ago.




And now, Nick, sans leather, sitting down with Glenn Morton.

ObamaCare is set up so that if the federal government needs more money to fund that high level of contribution they can take it from anyone, even people that have not purchased health insurance. No employer can duplicate that level of contribution. Ultimately everybody is going to go into the exchange(s).
In projecting the program’s costs, the Congressional Budget Office figures that about 7 percent of the workforce currently covered by employer-provided insurance will drop those policies and sign up for the subsidized insurance. That estimate – and hence, the cost structure of the program – has been challenged by sources such as McKinsey & Company, the consulting firm, which reckons a far higher percentage of workers will opt out of their current job-based plans. In a survey of employers released in June, McKinsey found that 30 percent will “definitely or probably” drop their coverage as Obamacare kicks into high gear in 2014. Among “employers with a high awareness of reform, this proportion rises to more than 50 percent,” says the report. Why? It will be cheaper to pay fines than to provide coverage. If those estimates are accurate, the cost savings ObamaCare supporters tout are a pipe dream.
And when this moment of realization arrives in 2014, we will have yet one more unsustainable entitlement program on our hands. The solution: Remove the middle men, whether it's the government or the employer so that there is greater transparency as to what health care actually costs so that the individual can make better informed decisions as to what to spend his money on with respect to health care. A high deductible/low premium, Chinese menu-style manner of coverage is our idea of a health care plan. But we guess those types of decisions aren't ours to make anymore. It's about the freedom, stupid.

Tuesday, August 16, 2011

Once is happenstance, twice is a coincidence. The third time is enemy action


As the President is rolling around the Midwest in Greyhound One blaming the tea party, "bad luck" and everyone but himself and his crappy economic advisors for the deplorable state of the economy, we have been able to string together enough data points to come to one firm conclusion: Why should it be any surprise... why should it be so unexpected that the economy is in the tank and possibly sliding back into a recession when members of Team O think that it's a tremendous accomplishment that we have a record number of people on food stamps.

Here's Secretary of Agriculture, Tom Vilsack explaining to a host on MSNBC's Morning Joe how it is they really have no intentions of getting people off food stamps and how they are content to do quite the opposite.



0:26 food stamps "... are putting people to work."

0:45 "... the food stamp program... is also economic stimulus. Every dollar in SNAP benefits generates a $1.84 in the economy."

1:03 food stamps "... is the most direct stimulus you can get into the economy during tough times."


And at the end did he really just suggest that California, Texas and Florida were doing a poor job of stimulating their economies because they didn't have enough people in the food stamp program?

And you may have noticed that Vilsack nearly doubles-down on ridiculousness with that 1:1.84 multiplier effect as just last week White House spokesman Jay Carney claimed only a 1:1 mulitiplier effect. It should be readily apparent by now that with the current state of our economy and the wide disparity between those claimed numbers, these two were just pulling their respective multiplier effect numbers completely out of thin air.

Again, when President Obama has surrounded himself with such a quantity and quality of economic illiterates... people that are actually proud of how many people are on food stamps and, like Nancy Pelosi, giddy about how many people are receiving jobless benefits because they are the best economic stimulants, why should we be surprised that our economy is showing no sign of recovery?

Where there should be shame and some degree of contrition, there is only back-slapping. Pathetic.





Paul Krugman: we need a cold war with space aliens or something

Yesterday, when we were musing about what sort of re-branding Team O was going to apply to their tired old bag of Keynesian stunts, little did we know that Paul Krugman was way out ahead of the curve with his messaging. How far out there? Like, way out there, man... way the freak out there.


Gird thyselves, people, against the gnarly Martians...





If we discovered that, you know, space aliens were planning to attack and we needed a massive buildup to counter the space alien threat and really inflation and budget deficits took secondary place to that, this slump would be over in 18 months. And then if we discovered, oops, we made a mistake, there aren’t any aliens, we’d be better–


Good grief. How bad are things when you are coming up with Twilight Zone episodes to justify horrible economic policies? So bad, we almost ignored Fareed Zakaria's patently ridiculous dig-a-hole/fill-a-hole multiplier effect theory.

And to what Krugman is saying, doesn't this administration manage by crisis as it is, space alien threat or not?

Yep. Don't expect anything different economic policy-wise from Team O, however, how it is that it will be justified should prove to be highly amusing.

Some more (of other people's) thoughts on the riots in England





But first, we can't remember where we heard it or read it but it went a little something like this: "Everything in England is regulated except the crime."



And here's Secular Apostate on making nothing out of something (and in this case, quite a bit of something):

The anthem of these young people who make nothing out of something was penned by the unlamentably late Amy Winehouse:

I didn’t get a lot in class
But I know it don’t come in a shot glass
They tried to make me go to rehab
But I said ‘no, no, no’

And I can’t blame her for refusing re-habilitation.

Because she was deliberately de-habilitated, and she knew it. She was dehabilitated by a toxic politico-cultural brew of entitlement thinking, moral relativity, and reward for indolence and excess. By my lights, given her brazen drug abuse and public drunkenness, she should have been cooling her buns in jail. If she had been, she would be alive today. Instead, we have an outstanding natural talent, destroyed, rotting in the grave.

Yes, you can make nothing out of something.


For those of you in Placentia, California wondering just who the heck is Amy Winehouse, check it out:


Sober for a month now...





Related:

More, I do not want to encourage entitlements; I do not think a Republic can survive when those who pay little or no tax determine the size of government and the entitlements to the citizens. I do not want to encourage a society in which all men are paid for existing, and no man must pay for his sins – or for his dinner, for that matter.

And when folks like Warren Buffet whine that the rich aren't paying their fair share, to what end is his whining? What assurances are built into place that increasing government revenue would actually go towards reducing the federal defecit? There isn't so please quit whining.

Monday, August 15, 2011

News item of the day

News ledes that make you wonder upon which planet the New York Times and/or the Obama administration are currently residing.

As the economy worsens, President Obama and his senior aides are considering whether to adopt a more combative approach on economic issues, seeking to highlight substantive differences with Republicans in Congress and on the campaign trail rather than continuing to pursue elusive compromises, advisers to the president say.

Elusive compromises like Porkulus, Cash for Clunkers, Cash for Caulkers, car company takeovers and ObamaCare all which enjoyed zero bi-partisan support and which did nothing for, and can be argued, did further harm to the economy. Those elusive compormises?

Mr. Obama plans to spend time this weekend considering his options, advisers said. The White House expects to unveil new job-creation proposals in early September
.

Can't wait to see how the same old Keynesian gimmickry is going to be re-packaged and re-spun in just a few weeks.


So far, most signs point to a continuation of the nonconfrontational approach — better to do something than nothing — that has defined this administration. Mr. Obama and his aides are skeptical that voters will reward bold proposals if those ideas do not pass Congress. It is their judgment that moderate voters want tangible results rather than speeches.

“If you’re talking about a stunt, I don’t think a stunt is what the American people are looking for,” the White House press secretary, Jay Carney, told reporters on Wednesday. “They’re looking for leadership, and they’re looking for a focus on economic growth and job creation.”

Actually, give "nothing" a try. Seriously. Give it a whack because nothing they have tried so far has done any good. And stunts? Mr. Carney, kind sir, stunts and demand-side gimmicks are all this administration has offered up.


And as for our wondering about re-packaging failed Keynesian policies, it doesn't look like Team O is going to even worry about any slick re-branding because it's mainstream economic theory, dontcha know?

A wide range of economists say the administration should call for a new round of stimulus spending, as prescribed by mainstream economic theory, to create jobs and promote growth. It is clear that the House would never pass such a plan.


The campaign meme of the Obama adminstration which will be dutifully parroted by their water-carriers in the media has been set and you won't be surprised to know the crappy state of the economy has nothing to do with them but rather the fellow that preceded Obama and those damn pesky Republicans that keep getting in the way of allowing the administration from further ruining the economy.




Programming reminder




Still plenty of time to vote in our Chargers/NFL-themed polls directly to your right.


Check out our post back on Thursday, here, for some background knowledge.

Your high-speed choo-choo update (UPDATED)


(please scroll down for update)


Like the Sun rising in the East...

Building tracks for the first section of California's proposed high-speed rail line will cost $2.9 billion to $6.8 billion more than originally estimated, raising questions about the affordability of the nation's most ambitious rail project at a time when its planning and finances are under fire.

A 2009 business plan developed for the California High-Speed Authority, the entity overseeing the project, estimated costs at about $7.1 billion for the equivalent stretch of tracks. Officials say those estimates were made before detailed engineering work and feedback from communities along the proposed route.

The latest estimates are contained in two environmental impact studies that were shared with The Associated Press before their public release on Tuesday.

The truly scary part of this continuing sad saga of high speed trains here in California is that the "first section" that has been under-estimated, on the conservative side, to the tune of the entire federal Cash for Clunkers program ($3 billion), is that they underestimated the easy part of the track-laying.

If the powers-that-be are underestimating what it's going to cost to lay tracks between the sprawling metroplises of Borden and Corcoran out in the middle of the Central Valley, just wait for the budget-busting fun to begin when it comes time to sharpening the pencil up over mountain passes into Los Angeles and right-of-ways in and around San Francisco. What could possibly go wrong?

We've had ourselves quite a few completely senseless boondoggles over the past few years, but if California's high-speed choo-choo endeavor stays on its current trajectory (and it's early, gang) then it may prove to be the queen-mother of all boondoggle debacles. And we're looking at you, ethanol.



(UPDATE #1) We are gladly liberating what B-Daddy shared in the comments section.

Matt Groenig: pork buster?




Sunday, August 14, 2011

Fear not: Gen X is on its way!




Earlier, this spring in conjunction with some commentary about Paul Ryan's budget proposal we spoke of a book Generations we read some twenty years ago. The book framed the history of the country in terms of 4 consecutive and recurrng generational co-horts. Of course, we were most interested in our generation, the Gen Xers and our Reactive generational cohorts that preceded us. The narrative arc that was common to our cohort generations was that though they were dismissed as shiftless screw-ups earlier in life (F. Scott Fitzgerald of the Lost Generation of the roaring 20s was the poster boy for Gen X's slackers of the 90s), they were called upon to make the tough calls and sacrifices in adulthood (think FDR, Dwight Eisenhower, George Patton and Harry Truman guiding the nation during the Great Depression and WWII).

With entitlement reform finally getting off top-dead-center at the state level, it's becoming increasing clear the 800 lb. gorilla sitting in the room at the federal level is the scrap that Generation X is going to be asked to take on.

And it's also becoming increasingly clear that we are not alone in that thought. Dig this from Reed Galen:

I believe we as a country, and more specifically those of us in the Gen X cohort, are looking in the mirror today. The question facing us is essentially the same: do we have what it takes?

Folks should be forgiven for asking, “For God’s sake, what’s next?” For any number of reasons we can’t seem to buy a break. And for entirely too many of us, we’re looking for someone to come help us fix our problems, either those we share as a people, those thrust upon us, or those of our own making. To return to my semi-Texas roots, it’s bootstrap time. To the extent each of us have the ability to solve our problems, now is the time to get after it. One thing is clear: the cavalry isn’t coming; they sold the horses and sent the rifles to Mexico.
(ed. note: we have no idea whether or not Galen was speaking tongue-in-cheek with respect to that last statement because he speaketh the literal truth.)

More than a small amount of time is spent blaming ”the system.” It’s the system’s fault Washington can’t get its act together. It’s the system’s fault bankers make too much money. It’s the system’s fault the sun rises in the east and sets in the west. What the system has created the most of though, is apathy. Worse than apathy is antipathy. We are a hair’s breadth away from "the system" being seen as not just unfair but illegitimate. When 17% of voters claim in a recent survey that the Federal government is no longer qualified to tell them what to do, antipathy is taking hold of the populace generally and the electorate specifically.

(ed. note: can we be forgiven for thinking 17% is disappointingly small?)

More Galen:

As my generation is actuarially responsible for the safety nets of our elders, we should double-down on the assumption that we’re on our own. Not much more complaining needed on that front: We made a promise to look after them the day we joined the workforce; maybe even the day we first showed up in our parents’ arms.

I hope, like me, most of my generation doesn’t plan to sit around and worry about what "the system" has done, or might do to them. The days of thinking about how things were, or how things should be are gone. Everyday we go out and try to make the best life we can for ourselves and our families, and ask "the system" to just leave us alone. If the Beltway politicians want to screw around with debt ceilings and Super Committees that will do little other than raise our cost of living, have at it. But there are a lot more out here like us than they think - and they ignore us at their peril
.

Folks, the tea party is Generation X. Mocked, reviled and scorned but guess what? We figured it out. For all our human flaws and frailties and for all our missteps, real and perceived, we know what needs to be done. While the rest of the world is content to whistle past the graveyard, we are fully cognizant and prepared to make those sacrifices that must be made if we desire to see this country retain its greatness and not descend into a state of a banana republic, a destination at which we most certainly will arrive unless very specific and rapid course corrections are made.

To quote Secular Apostate: "If anybody was going to take up the slack for you, they would have arrived already."


Have a great rest of your Sunday. We'll see everybody bright and early on Monday.





Video clip of the day


And one that is totally appropriate for these dog days of August.

Dude in Baltimore catches home run ball on 3 straight days.




For more on the story, go here.