Sunday, August 3, 2008

Saving You from Yourself (Updated)


“Today we are taking a strong step toward creating a healthier future for California,”

We were in the air, returning from Boston when this showed up here in the paper last week. The trans fats ban was signed into law two Fridays ago by the Governor.

Stephen Joseph who was a consultant to New York City in developing its ban, said trans fat is a larger health risk than saturated fat because it reduces so-called good cholesterol.

Who is Stephen Joseph, you are asking yourself? A dietician, perhaps or someone who holds an advanced degree in medicine and who also specializes in heart disease or cholesterol? Nope. Dude’s a lawyer....

The bill's author, Democratic Assemblyman Tony Mendoza of Artesia, said he hoped the legislation would lead to similar laws in other states.
“They've come to the realization that this is something that Americans want, that Californians want,” he said. “People are just more health conscious about what they eat.”


As sure as the Sun rises in the East, Tony has confused Californians desire to eat healthier with a desire for legislation dictating what they can and cannot eat but given a choice between the two, we know on what side of the coin our friends in Sacramento will always come down.

The California Restaurant Association opposed the California bill but has no plans to challenge the law, spokesman Daniel Conway said.
Conway said the association has no plans to challenge the law, in part because restaurants already are phasing out trans fats to satisfy customers.


Yes. You would be 100% correct if the first thing that crossed your mind was: “Then why do we need this law?” And as we’ve written before and as often times happens when legislation is passed in the name of the “N-word”, this law may actually be counterproductive as people pile-on even more trans fat-free goodies out of a false sense of security.

Our schools are miserable, we are paying way too much for goods and services across the board because of our politicians’ refusal to even consider off-shore drilling, we are facing a water shortage where plans to build a desalination plant here in San Diego lack the political backing to stand-up to environmental groups and we will continue to drive business and industry out of the state (… as companies decide to manufacture, cement, for instance in Nevada and Arizona only to truck it right back into the state in order to comply with the California Air Resources Board’s phased-in mandates to reduce CO2 emissions…. actually pumping more CO2 into the air) but….. doggone, we’re healthier and safer now because Sacramento has outlawed talking on cell phones while driving and trans fats in restaurants.

Dontcha feel so much better knowing people much smarter and benevolent than you have got your back?

UPDATE #1:We were watching the Hall of Fame preseason game this evening between the Washington Redskins and the Indianapolis Colts and ‘Skins QB Colt Brennan a rookie out of Hawai’i was making a very impressive showing with 2 touchdown passes. Commentators Al Michaels and John Madden were commenting on how Brennan’s name just sounded like a QB’s name. Madden commented that only thing that would make it better would be if he were from Butte, Montana (he's from Orange County, California) and Michaels felt compelled to one-up Madden by saying, “Yeah, and smoking a Marlboro.”

It’s obvious that Michaels didn’t get the memo and if he did, he chose to ignore it at his own peril. When the hell are people going to realize you just can’t make flip comments like that anymore. Its poor form and just encourages bad behavior. Can you imagine, now, the literally dozens of kids who were watching this game and because of Michaels' rash, insensitive and socially-corroding remarks, will want to go to Hawai’i to play football and smoke… though, we’re pretty sure that if they smoke anything in Hawai’i it won’t be cigarettes. Irresponsible. Simply irresponsible and unacceptable behavior that cannot be tolerated any longer. We need a law!!!

6 comments:

K T Cat said...

How about our inability to open a solar power plant in the desert because the environmentalists won't let us run the power lines into the city from the desert?

Dean said...

KT, I forgot about that one.

But in a bizarre sense, I will give the enviro-wackos some credit for being consistent. If they want to kick off-roaders out of the desert for disturbing the African dung beetle then the same shoe should fit for any other source of disturbance to the (not so fragile) ecosystem.

Nevermind that they are off their rockers in both cases....

It just points to the anti-civilization/pro-devolution mindset of a segment of the green movement.

Anonymous said...

Geez, Louise. How about a little full-disclosure, KT?

Let's start with this: What piece of land is smack dab in the path of the so-called "Preferred Alternative" of the power company?

Give ya a hint: It's one of those annoying little places we occasionally set aside for future generations to preserve things in their natural state. Desert Bighorn Sheep, Pup Fish, mountain lions, palm oases, etc.

That's right, a park. In this case, perhaps the crown jewel of the California's state park system: Anza-Borrego.

Now, you move that little sucker 30 miles to the south where there's an existing freeway corridor, we've got no problems.

But to say that environmentalists don't want Sunrise's preferred route because it runs through a desert is taking liberties with the truth.

By the way, if you do see an African dung-beetle out there, you can go ahead and squish it as a non-native species.

- Mongo

Dean said...

Mongo, are you talking about the location of the solar plant or the proposed Sunrise power link route? It was my understanding that the power link was to a conventionally-fired plant way out East (possibly south of the border) and not to a solar plant. Could be wrong.

As far as the power link route is concerned, I agree. The I-8 corridor seems to be the least intrusive and with the inherent benefit of collacated infrastructure to more quickly and efficiently get the damn thing built.

I'll have to dig up the article but some botanists are of the opinion that off-road vehicles actually aid the germination process of desert plants as they become carriers of both seed and pollen. Of course, these botanists live in hiding.

K T Cat said...

Mongo, power lines run all over the place without killing everything in sight. If you, personally, are willing to pay for the extra cost of running tens of miles more of power lines and the power losses from running the electricity through that much more cable, then be my guest. All so you can avoid having, what, a 100 yard swatch cut through hundreds of square miles of park lands.

Anonymous said...

The actual solar plant is way out in BFE where it doesn't really effect anything.

The "preferred route" of the power company is the problem. It cuts, as you know, right through the heart of Anza Borrego Desert State Park.

As for the "extra cost" KT, are you trying to tell me it is cheaper to run the line through an area with no roads (where there is harder access for crews) in a state park than it is to run it through the I-8 corridor where all kinds of access exists?

Are you further trying to pull a fast one and say that the lines -- from their starting point way out by Yuma -- would have all that much in terms of excess mileage of lines added by the time they hit the Laguna Moutains if they were to run through the I8 corridor rather than through Anza Borrego Desert State Park?

You are kidding, right? This is one where you'll be saying, "Ahhhhhh!!! Had you goin' for a minute!!", right??

- Mongo loves a kidder