While doing research for our next McCain hit piece we ran across a legal document that caught our attention. Its an 18th century piece that looks to be based, in part, on British law. It starts off well enough but unfortunately it too often descends into paranoid-delusional, black helicopters territory by establishing all these restrictions against abuses of power by the government which the authors obviously reasoned, the potentiality of such abuse was inevitable.
We tried to think how the provisions contained therein would succeed if applied today in 21st-century America. Some better than others and others yet, not at all. We like it, anyway. It has a sort of an old-world charm to it. We suppose its cute in its quaintness. Here it is if you care to read.
Wednesday, January 30, 2008
Rummaging around in the Attic
Posted by Dean at 1/30/2008 05:01:00 PM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
I loved my old college history prof who pointed out what an incredibly radical document the Dec of Independence was (esp. for its time) in demanding personal freedoms and liberties, etc., and then set it against the Constitution -- as if the framers, post Rev. War victory, had to say "All right, everybody calm down", we need some rules. So in order to "form a more PERFECT union", we're going to ennumerate some basic sh*t and get you frontier hicks back in line.
- Mongo
hmmmm.... I dunno, dude. There's an awful lot of "Congress shall make no law...", "no soldier shall...", "...shall not be infringed", "The right of the people... shall not be violated", "excessive bail shall not be required"....
...sounds like license for the hicks to get righteously twisted. Think Glamis on a long weekend.
Ah, yes. Glamis.
The Cradle of Democracy.
Which of the Framers do you suppose would have been most at home out there sucking down a Schlitz with racoon eyes after a day of tearing ass around the dunes?
I gotta get back for the beans...
- Mongo
Post a Comment