Monday, September 21, 2009

So is this what they mean by “non-appropriated funds” activities?

Suppose that instead of turning part of the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq into a college fraternity hazing ritual, the guards were running a whorehouse out of the cells contained therein. And to make matters worse, suppose they were throwing underage Iraqi girls into the mix.

You would be correct in thinking that this would be revolting and reprehensible behavior, especially when considering it is being done on the government dime.

Mosey on over to KT’s site where he demonstrates that not all revolting and reprehensible acts sponsored by your tax dollars are created equally, here.


Harrison said...

It doesn't jive with the media's narrative.

K T Cat said...

Thanks for the link.

Harrison, I can't grasp this one at all. Doesn't anything trump politics?

Harrison said...

Politics trumps politics which is why Liberals can't agree on what to do once they get into power.